Wilson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

168 Misc. 125, 5 N.Y.S.2d 310, 1938 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1694
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided May 27, 1938·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The trial judge erred in submitting to the jury for its decision the question whether the representation relied upon by defendant was material. The representation, if the insured had been a patient at the New York Hospital, was as matter of law material. (Geer v. Union Mutual Life Ins. Co., 273 N. Y. 261.)

Judgment, so far as appealed from, reversed and a new trial ordered, limited to the issue whether the assured was the Walter Wilson that had been treated at the New York Hospital as claimed in the defense.

Order affirmed.

All concur. Present — Lydon, Frankenthaler and Noonan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance, 168 Misc. 125, 5 N.Y.S.2d 310, 1938 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1694 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

168 Misc. 125 (Wilson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marine Midland Bank v. Labour
107 Misc. 2d 180 (New York County Courts, 1980)
In re the Accounting of Jennings
3 Misc. 2d 601 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1956)