Wilson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
This text of 168 Misc. 125 (Wilson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The trial judge erred in submitting to the jury for its decision the question whether the representation relied upon by defendant was material. The representation, if the insured had been a patient at the New York Hospital, was as matter of law material. (Geer v. Union Mutual Life Ins. Co., 273 N. Y. 261.)
Judgment, so far as appealed from, reversed and a new trial ordered, limited to the issue whether the assured was the Walter Wilson that had been treated at the New York Hospital as claimed in the defense.
Order affirmed.
All concur. Present — Lydon, Frankenthaler and Noonan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
168 Misc. 125, 5 N.Y.S.2d 310, 1938 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-metropolitan-life-insurance-nyappterm-1938.