Wilson v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
489 N.E.2d 1297, 66 N.Y.2d 988, 499 N.Y.S.2d 395, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 18346
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (111 AD2d 807).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Titone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wilson v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 489 N.E.2d 1297, 66 N.Y.2d 988, 499 N.Y.S.2d 395, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 18346 (N.Y. 1985).
489 N.E.2d 1297 (Wilson v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rall v. Hellman
284 A.D.2d 113 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Yunis v. First USA Bank
244 A.D.2d 187 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Wilson v. Samoval
194 A.D.2d 723 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Mancini v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.
185 A.D.2d 682 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Leidholdt v. L.F.P. Inc.
860 F.2d 890 (Ninth Circuit, 1988)
Dworkin v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.
668 F. Supp. 1408 (C.D. California, 1987)