Wilson v. McKeller

254 F. App'x 960
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 21, 2007
Docket07-6823
StatusUnpublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 254 F. App'x 960 (Wilson v. McKeller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilson v. McKeller, 254 F. App'x 960 (4th Cir. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

John Cooke Wilson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and *961 find that Wilson has failed to demonstrate that his injuries, if any, were not de mini-mus in nature. Wilson also alleges that one of the correctional officers used a racial slur while assaulting him. While the alleged statement was deplorable, mere threats or verbal abuse, without more, do not state a cognizable claim under § 1983. See Northington v. Jackson, 973 F.2d 1518, 1524 (10th Cir.1992) (citing Collins v. Cundy, 603 F.2d 825, 827 (10th Cir.1979)); see also Carter v. Morris, 164 F.3d 215, 219 n. 3 (4th Cir.1999). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wilson v. McKeller, No. 6:06-cv-01633-GRA (D.S.C. May 24, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Huffman v. Ruley
W.D. Virginia, 2025
Harold v. Lauren
W.D. Virginia, 2024
Powers v. Mathena
W.D. Virginia, 2021
HARRIS v. POOLE
M.D. North Carolina, 2020

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 F. App'x 960, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-mckeller-ca4-2007.