Wilson v. McDowell

65 Ill. 522
Illinois Supreme Court·Decided September 15, 1872·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Sheldon

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This was an action of ejectment, wherein the judgment in favor of the plaintiff purported to be rendered according to a stipulation of the parties on file.

It is.assigned for error that the court below was not authorized by the stipulation to render the judgment.

There is no bill of exceptions in the case. Consequently, according to former rulings of this court, we can not examine the stipulation, although the clerk has copied into the record what purports to be a stipulation. It could only be brought into the record by being embodied in a bill of exceptions.

In the absence of a bill of exceptions showing all the evidence in the case, it must be presumed, in support of the judgment, that there was sufficient evidence before the court below to warrant it.

The judgment must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. McDowell, 65 Ill. 522 (Ill. 1872).

65 Ill. 522 (Wilson v. McDowell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Donahoe v. City of Chicago
247 Ill. App. 435 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1928)
Raymer v. Modern Brotherhood of America
157 Ill. App. 510 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1910)
Yaeger v. City of Henry
39 Ill. App. 21 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1890)
Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Benham
25 Ill. App. 248 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1888)
Eureka Coal Co. v. Powers
10 Ill. App. 61 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1882)
Wike v. Campbell
5 Colo. 126 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1879)
Filley v. Cody
4 Colo. 542 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1879)
Knott v. Swannell
91 Ill. 25 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1878)