Wilson v. McDaniel

935 F.2d 1289, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 19641, 56 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 480, 1991 WL 105492
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 19, 1991
Docket91-1040
StatusUnpublished

This text of 935 F.2d 1289 (Wilson v. McDaniel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilson v. McDaniel, 935 F.2d 1289, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 19641, 56 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 480, 1991 WL 105492 (4th Cir. 1991).

Opinion

935 F.2d 1289

56 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 480

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Janet D. WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
L. James MCDANIEL, Principal, A.C. Larrimore, Assistant
Superintendent, Winston-Salem/Forsyth County
Schools, Winston-Salem/Forsyth County
School System, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-1040.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 20, 1991.
Decided June 19, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. Norwood Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (CA-89-815-WS-C)

Janet D. Wilson, appellant pro se.

Richard L. Rainey, Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, Winston-Salem, N.C., for appellees.

M.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Janet D. Wilson appeals from the district court's order dismissing her employment discrimination action brought under 42 U.S.C. Secs. 2000e et seq. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wilson v. McDaniel, CA-89-815-WS-C (M.D.N.C. Jan. 14, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
935 F.2d 1289, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 19641, 56 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 480, 1991 WL 105492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-mcdaniel-ca4-1991.