Wilson v. McClean

952 So. 2d 1228, 2007 WL 935477
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 30, 2007
Docket5D06-4010
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 952 So. 2d 1228 (Wilson v. McClean) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilson v. McClean, 952 So. 2d 1228, 2007 WL 935477 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

952 So.2d 1228 (2007)

Denver Ivan WILSON, Petitioner,
v.
Randolph McCLEAN, Esquire, Respondent.

No. 5D06-4010.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

March 30, 2007.

Denver Ivan Wilson, Sanford, pro se.

W.A. Randolph McClean of Jacobson, McClean, Chmelir & Ferwerda, Winter Springs, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks mandamus to compel the return of evidence and documents allegedly in the possession of his former attorney, a special public defender. His former attorney says that he returned the items. Because the resolution of this matter involves factfinding, we hereby transfer this cause to the Circuit Court for Seminole County for resolution. See Olivera-Herrera v. Taylor, 920 So.2d 765 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).

PETITION TRANSFERRED.

PLEUS, C.J., TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bell v. State
952 So. 2d 1228 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
952 So. 2d 1228, 2007 WL 935477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-mcclean-fladistctapp-2007.