WILSON v. MATOS TRANSPORT LLC
This text of WILSON v. MATOS TRANSPORT LLC (WILSON v. MATOS TRANSPORT LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
OJI R WILSON Civil Action No: 23-21378 (SDW) (AME) Plaintiff, ORDER v. MATOS TRANSPORT LLC, et al., January 31, 2025 Defendants.
WIGENTON, District Judge. This matter, having come before this Court on Plaintiff Oji R. Wilson’s motion for default judgment against Defendants Matos Transport LLC and Andy Y. Matos (D.E. 35), and this Court having reviewed Plaintiff’s submissions, IT IS on this 31st day of January 2025, ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment is DENIED for failure to obtain Clerk’s Entry of Default as to Matos Transport LLC and Andy Y. Matos, for failure to set forth damages, and because of the ongoing litigation with the non-defaulting Defendant. See Alpine Fresh, Inc. v. Jala Trucking Corp., 181 F. Supp. 3d 250, 258 (D.N.J. 2016). SO ORDERED. /s/ Susan D. Wigenton x SUSAN D. WIGENTON, U.S.D.J.
Orig: Clerk cc: André M. Espinosa, U.S.M.J. Parties
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
WILSON v. MATOS TRANSPORT LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-matos-transport-llc-njd-2025.