Wilson v. Maples

414 F. App'x 898
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMarch 31, 2011
DocketNo. 10-2605
StatusPublished

This text of 414 F. App'x 898 (Wilson v. Maples) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilson v. Maples, 414 F. App'x 898 (8th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas inmate Angela Wilson appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment and denial of preliminary injunctive relief in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit against employees of the Arkansas Department of Correction. Having carefully reviewed the record and considered Wilson’s arguments, we find no basis for reversal. See CDI Energy Servs., Inc. v. West River Pumps, Inc., 567 F.3d 398, 401-02 (8th Cir.2009) (denial of preliminary injunction is reviewed for abuse of discretion); Freeman v. Ace Tel. Ass’n, 467 F.3d 695, 697 (8th Cir.2006) (summary judgment is reviewed de novo). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment, see 8th Cir. R. 47B; and we deny Wilson’s motion for appointed appellate counsel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

CDI Energy Services, Inc. v. West River Pumps, Inc.
567 F.3d 398 (Eighth Circuit, 2009)
David F. Freeman v. Ace Telephone Assoc.
467 F.3d 695 (Eighth Circuit, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
414 F. App'x 898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-maples-ca8-2011.