Wilson v. Maples
This text of 414 F. App'x 898 (Wilson v. Maples) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Arkansas inmate Angela Wilson appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment and denial of preliminary injunctive relief in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit against employees of the Arkansas Department of Correction. Having carefully reviewed the record and considered Wilson’s arguments, we find no basis for reversal. See CDI Energy Servs., Inc. v. West River Pumps, Inc., 567 F.3d 398, 401-02 (8th Cir.2009) (denial of preliminary injunction is reviewed for abuse of discretion); Freeman v. Ace Tel. Ass’n, 467 F.3d 695, 697 (8th Cir.2006) (summary judgment is reviewed de novo). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment, see 8th Cir. R. 47B; and we deny Wilson’s motion for appointed appellate counsel.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
414 F. App'x 898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-maples-ca8-2011.