Wilson v. Louisiana

Supreme Court

Wilson v. Louisiana

341 U.S. 901, 71 S. Ct. 611

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedApril 9, 1951

DocketNo. 376

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 341 U.S. 901 (Wilson v. Louisiana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilson v. Louisiana, 341 U.S. 901, 71 S. Ct. 611 (1951).

Pincite

Opinion

Certiorari, 340 U. S. 864, to the Supreme Court of Louisiana. Per Curiam: The [902]*902judgment is affirmed.

Lubin F. Laurent argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Henry P. Viering. Michael E. Cul-ligan, Assistant Attorney General of Louisiana, and Frank H. Langridge argued the cause for respondent. With them on the brief was Bolivar E. Kemp, Jr., Attorney General. Dissenting: Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Frankfurter, and Mr. Justice Douglas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Certiorari, 340 U. S. 864, to the Supreme Court of Louisiana. Per Curiam: The [902]*902judgment is affirmed.

Lubin F. Laurent argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Henry P. Viering. Michael E. Cul-ligan, Assistant Attorney General of Louisiana, and Frank H. Langridge argued the cause for respondent. With them on the brief was Bolivar E. Kemp, Jr., Attorney General. Dissenting: Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Frankfurter, and Mr. Justice Douglas.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

341 U.S. 901, 71 S. Ct. 611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-louisiana-scotus-1951.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack