Wilson v. Kline's Department Store
This text of 166 N.W.2d 817 (Wilson v. Kline's Department Store) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant appeals from the trial court’s denial of its motions for directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Such motions were based on defendant’s contention that there was no proof of negligence and that the proof established plaintiff guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law.
A review of the record convinces this Court that jury questions were presented on the issues of negligence and contributory negligence.
Affirmed with costs to plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
166 N.W.2d 817, 15 Mich. App. 540, 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 1517, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-klines-department-store-michctapp-1969.