Wilson v. Kelly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wilson v. Kelly

127 A.D.2d 979, 512 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43468

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 27, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 127 A.D.2d 979 (Wilson v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilson v. Kelly, 127 A.D.2d 979, 512 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43468 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously vacated on the law and determination modified on the law and as modified confirmed in accordance with the following memorandum: There was substantial evidence to support the determination (see, Matter of Lang v Kelly, 127 AD2d 978).

Respondent concedes that the finding of the Hearing Officer that petitioner violated rule 180.20 of 7 NYCRR 270.1 (b) (22) (i) and Attica Correctional Facility rule 16.4 was error since the correctional facility rule book had not been filed with the Secretary of State. This portion of the determination is annulled. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Newman, J. — art 78.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously vacated on the law and determination modified on the law and as modified confirmed in accordance with the following memorandum: There was substantial evidence to support the determination (see, Matter of Lang v Kelly, 127 AD2d 978).

Respondent concedes that the finding of the Hearing Officer that petitioner violated rule 180.20 of 7 NYCRR 270.1 (b) (22) (i) and Attica Correctional Facility rule 16.4 was error since the correctional facility rule book had not been filed with the Secretary of State. This portion of the determination is annulled. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Newman, J. — art 78.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

127 A.D.2d 979, 512 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-kelly-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack