Wilson v. Kedgeley
30 F. Cas. 138, 1 Cranch 477
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedDecember 15, 1807
StatusPublished
This text of 30 F. Cas. 138 (Wilson v. Kedgeley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wilson v. Kedgeley, 30 F. Cas. 138, 1 Cranch 477 (circtddc 1807).
Opinion
Trespass vi et armis, for beating his slaver whereby he lost his services.
F. S. Key moved in arrest of judgment, that trespass vi et armis does not lie by the master in such a ease. But it ought to have been trespass on the case.
Motion overruled. See Esp. N. P. 380, 598? 3 Bl. Comm. 393.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
30 F. Cas. 138, 1 Cranch 477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-kedgeley-circtddc-1807.