Wilson v. Johnson

164 F. App'x 425
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wilson v. Johnson. Read the opinion of the Court — 535 F.3d 262
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 2, 2006·No. No. 05-7452·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

David Wilson appeals the district court’s order denying his action, filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000), challenging the decisions and procedures of the Virginia Parole Board. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Wilson v. Johnson, No. CA-05-842-1-GBL (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 26, 2005 & entered Aug. 29, 2005). We reject Wilson’s contention that the Su[426]*426preme Court’s decision in Wilkinson v. Dotson, 544 U.S. 74, 125 S.Ct. 1242, 161 L.Ed.2d 253 (2005), renders the district court’s decision incorrect. We deny Wilson’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis as unnecessary in view of his PLRA status. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. Johnson, 164 F. App'x 425 (4th Cir. 2006).

164 F. App'x 425 (Wilson v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilkinson v. Dotson
544 U.S. 74 (Supreme Court, 2005)