Wilson v. Jenkins

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6307

CLAUDE WILSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

J. JENKINS, Sergeant Deputy Sheriff; T. STEPHENS, Deputy; PHAYME, Sergeant Deputy; MCGAUGE, Deputy; RICHMOND CITY SHERIFF OFFICE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:05-cv-00874-JRS)

Submitted: June 22, 2006 Decided: June 30, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Claude Wilson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Claude Wilson appeals from the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint because he failed

to return the “consent to collection of fees” form, as ordered by

the court.* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See Wilson v. Jenkins, No. 3:05-cv-00874-JRS (E.D.

Va. Feb. 7, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* The dismissal was without prejudice to Wilson’s right to re- file his action.

- 2 -