Wilson v. James H. Boud & Brother
31 A. 78, 166 Pa. 273, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1191
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 28, 1895
DocketAppeal, No. 97
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 31 A. 78 (Wilson v. James H. Boud & Brother) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wilson v. James H. Boud & Brother, 31 A. 78, 166 Pa. 273, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1191 (Pa. 1895).
Opinion
The rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defence was rightly discharged. There is nothing in the case that requires discussion.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gilbert v. Saul
D. Alaska, 2020
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
31 A. 78, 166 Pa. 273, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-james-h-boud-brother-pa-1895.