Wilson v. Hy-Lan Furniture Co.

332 F.2d 284
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 20, 1964
DocketNo. 9314
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 332 F.2d 284 (Wilson v. Hy-Lan Furniture Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilson v. Hy-Lan Furniture Co., 332 F.2d 284 (4th Cir. 1964).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Hy-Lan Furniture Company, Incorporated, asserts that it was not afforded an [285]*285adequate opportunity to present proof of its claim in this bankruptcy proceeding. The District Court determined that two letters written January 2, 1963 by Hy-Lan to the Referee constituted proof of claim. The issue of Hy-Lan’s opportunity to furnish further proof primarily raises a question of fact.

Consideration of the record, briefs and argument persuades us that the District Judge properly affirmed the order of the Referee disallowing Hy-Lan’s claim in part. The District Judge did not abuse his discretion by denying Hy-Lan’s motion to vacate the Referee’s order and to reopen the proceedings for further proof.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilson v. Hy-Lan Furniture Company
332 F.2d 284 (Fourth Circuit, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
332 F.2d 284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-hy-lan-furniture-co-ca4-1964.