Wilson v. Hinnant

43 S.E. 408, 117 Ga. 46, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 146
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 7, 1903
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 43 S.E. 408 (Wilson v. Hinnant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilson v. Hinnant, 43 S.E. 408, 117 Ga. 46, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 146 (Ga. 1903).

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

Where two partners enter into a written contract wherein it is stipulated that one sells to the other his interest in all of the realty and personalty belonging to the partnership and also “ all of the indebtedness due or owing to said partnership, whether by note, open account, or otherwise,” and the selling partner at'that time owes an account to the firm, and subsequently is sued on the account by the purchasing partner, there is no error, in the absence of any plea of fraud, accident, or mistake, in rejecting evidence of the defendant to the effect that it was his understanding that he was to be released from his indebtedness to the partnership. The evidence would change and vary the terms of the written contract.

Judgment affirmed.

By five Justices.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marietta Broadcasting Co. v. Advance Marketing Research, Inc.
200 S.E.2d 134 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1973)
Rawlings v. Fields
110 S.E. 499 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 S.E. 408, 117 Ga. 46, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-hinnant-ga-1903.