Wilson v. Hill

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Wilson v. Hill

133 A. 926, 286 Pa. 318, 1926 Pa. LEXIS 550

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 20, 1926

DocketAppeal, 174

StatusPublished

This text of 133 A. 926 (Wilson v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilson v. Hill, 133 A. 926, 286 Pa. 318, 1926 Pa. LEXIS 550 (Pa. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Plaintiff was seriously injured through negligence of defendant; he recovered a verdict for $5,000, on which, after its reduction to $4,000, the court below entered judgment. Defendant has appealed and contends only that the verdict is so excessive that we should reverse the court below for not granting a new trial. After reading the evidence on the question involved, we are not convinced of reversible error.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

Plaintiff was seriously injured through negligence of defendant; he recovered a verdict for $5,000, on which, after its reduction to $4,000, the court below entered judgment. Defendant has appealed and contends only that the verdict is so excessive that we should reverse the court below for not granting a new trial. After reading the evidence on the question involved, we are not convinced of reversible error.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

133 A. 926, 286 Pa. 318, 1926 Pa. LEXIS 550, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-hill-pa-1926.