Wilson v. Henningsen
This text of 148 N.W. 1081 (Wilson v. Henningsen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant appeals from a judgment. The so-called paper book does not contain the judgment, but the original judgment roll is in the return to this court. An inspection thereof reveals no error. In the litigation defendant has been his own attorney. Because of his apparent inexperience in legal procedure, we have examined the documents in the return and the files herein with a view to discover his grievances (there being no assignments of error), and we find these relate to claimed defects in the evidence and errors in the charge of the court. There is no settled case or bill of exceptions. We are therefore not in a position to consider any matter which the appellant intended to raise by his appeal, and it should be dismissed. So ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
148 N.W. 1081, 127 Minn. 520, 1914 Minn. LEXIS 934, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-henningsen-minn-1914.