Wilson v. Henderson

590 F.2d 408
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedSeptember 20, 1978
DocketNo. 832, Docket 78-2015
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 590 F.2d 408 (Wilson v. Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilson v. Henderson, 590 F.2d 408 (2d Cir. 1978).

Opinion

OAKES, Circuit Judge (dissenting):

I wish to have my dissent to the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc noted not to add anything to the substance of what was said in my original dissenting panel opinion but to underscore the importance of the Miranda and Massiah issues involved, an importance that is emphasized by Professor Yale Kamisar’s forthcoming article, Brewer v. Williams, Massiah and Miranda: What Is “Interrogation”? When Does It [409]*409Matter?, 67 Geo.L.J. 1 (1978), to be published shortly. I note also that a panel majority of the Fourth Circuit has recently held on the Massiah point directly contrary to the panel majority in this case. Henry v. United States, 590 F.2d 544 (4th Cir. 1978).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
590 F.2d 408, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-henderson-ca2-1978.