Wilson v. Henderson

Second Circuit

Wilson v. Henderson

590 F.2d 408

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided September 20, 1978·No. No. 832, Docket 78-2015·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

OAKES, Circuit Judge (dissenting):

I wish to have my dissent to the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc noted not to add anything to the substance of what was said in my original dissenting panel opinion but to underscore the importance of the Miranda and Massiah issues involved, an importance that is emphasized by Professor Yale Kamisar’s forthcoming article, Brewer v. Williams, Massiah and Miranda: What Is “Interrogation”? When Does It [409]*409Matter?, 67 Geo.L.J. 1 (1978), to be published shortly. I note also that a panel majority of the Fourth Circuit has recently held on the Massiah point directly contrary to the panel majority in this case. Henry v. United States, 590 F.2d 544 (4th Cir. 1978).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OAKES, Circuit Judge (dissenting):

I wish to have my dissent to the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc noted not to add anything to the substance of what was said in my original dissenting panel opinion but to underscore the importance of the Miranda and Massiah issues involved, an importance that is emphasized by Professor Yale Kamisar’s forthcoming article, Brewer v. Williams, Massiah and Miranda: What Is “Interrogation”? When Does It [409]*409Matter?, 67 Geo.L.J. 1 (1978), to be published shortly. I note also that a panel majority of the Fourth Circuit has recently held on the Massiah point directly contrary to the panel majority in this case. Henry v. United States, 590 F.2d 544 (4th Cir. 1978).

Wilson v. Henderson, 590 F.2d 408 (2d Cir. 1978).

Pincite

590 F.2d 408 (Wilson v. Henderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related