Wilson v. Hathaway
This text of 42 Iowa 173 (Wilson v. Hathaway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[175]*175The comity auditor is required to “keep in his office books for the transfer of real estate, which shall consist of a transfer book, index book, and book of plats.” Code, § 1948. It is provided in sections 1949 and 1950 how these books shall be ruled and prepared for use. Section 1951 provides that “whenever a deed of unconditional conveyance of real estate is presented, the auditor shall enter in the index book, in alphabetical order, the name of the grantee, and opposite thereto the number of the page of the transfer book on which such transfer is made; and upon the transfer book he shall enter in the proper columns the name of the grantee, the name of the grantor, date of instrument, the character of the instrument, the description of the property, and the number or letter of the plat on which the same is marked.”
The auditor must so keep the book of plats as to “ show the number of lot and block, or township and range, divided into sections and sub-divisions as occasion may require, and shall designate each piece of land or town lot, and mark in pencil the name of the owner thereon in a legible manner.” * * * * Code, § 1950. No deed of real estate can lawfully be filed for record until the proper entries have been made in the transfer books. Code, § 1953.
From these transfer books it can be seen W'ho have absolute conveyances of lands through which a new road is proposed to run, where the holders of such conveyances have procured the proper entries to be made in the transfer books, but if the holder of an unconditional conveyance has failed to have these entries made, or where, as in the case before us, the person claiming to be the owner has only a title bond or contract for a conveyance upon payment or other condition, the transfer books will not show his title or ownership.
. The publication of the prescribed notice in a newspaper, as provided in the same section of the statute, is required to be made in all cases; and the personal service of the notice is required to be made upon the unconditional owner, as appears by the transfer books in the auditor’s office, if such owner resides in the county. If he does not reside in the county, jurisdiction may be acquired to establish and open the road, without personal service of the notice. So, if the person who claims to be the owner of the land does not procure the entries required to be made in the transfer books, or holds a contract or bond for a deed, no personal service of notice upon him is necessary to give jurisdiction, the publication of the notice being duly made.
The plaintiff has not averred in his petition that the publication of the required notice was not giyen. He shows that he was not served personally, but we have seen that he was 'not entitled to be thus served with the notice. The demurrer was properly sustained, and the judgment must be
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
42 Iowa 173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-hathaway-iowa-1875.