Wilson v. Hamilton

9 Johns. 442
CourtCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors
DecidedJanuary 15, 1812
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 9 Johns. 442 (Wilson v. Hamilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilson v. Hamilton, 9 Johns. 442 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1812).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Here is a change of parties in interest, pending . . the appeal; and as all the parties in interest are not now before the court, we cannot pronounce a decree which will embrace the whole matter in litigation, and put a final end to the controversy. It is an established principle of a court of equity not to decree finally until all the proper parties are before the court. _a_s this court does not possess original jurisdiction, so as to award process to bring in the parties whose interest has accrued since the appeal was filed, the cause ought to be remanded without prejudice to either party.

The following order was thereupon made:

On the petition of Isaac Hamilton, one of the respondents, stating that one of the respondents, a feme sole, had married, and one of the respondents and one of the appellants had died, pending the appeal; and on motion of Mr. Henry, counsel for the petitioner, and to the end that the proper steps may be taken in the court below, to call in the parties whose interests have accrued by the marriage and deaths .of the parties aforesaid; ordered that the said cause be remanded, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shannon v. State
18 Wis. 604 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1864)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 Johns. 442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-hamilton-nycterr-1812.