Wilson v. Groover
This text of 91 S.E. 113 (Wilson v. Groover) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action for injunction against cutting timber and for damages to the timber, the petition alleged ground for injunction, and damage in a stated amount. The prayers were that the defendant be restrained and permanently enjoined, and “that process issue requiring the defendant to be and appear at the next term of . . court to be held in and for said county on the fourth Monday in October, then and there to answer your petitioner’s complaint,” and “that your petitioner have such other and further relief as the nature of the case and the principles of law, justice, and equity demand.” Held:
1. The portion of the prayer first quoted, when considered in connection with the allegations of the petition, was sufficient upon which to base a money verdict. Fitzpatrick v. Paulding, 131 Ga. 693 (63 S. E. 213); Worthy v. Farmers Life Confederation, 139 Ga. 81 (76 S. E. 856). The case differs in its facts from Schmitt v. Schneider, 109 Ga. 628 (35 S. E. 145), and cases cited.
2. The evidence was sufficient to authorize the verdict. The grounds of amendment to the motion for new trial are covered by the ruling last stated. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 S.E. 113, 146 Ga. 369, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-groover-ga-1917.