Wilson v. Griffin

1 White & W. 764
CourtTexas Commission of Appeals
DecidedDecember 14, 1881
DocketNo. 1201, Op. Book No. 3, p. 342
StatusPublished

This text of 1 White & W. 764 (Wilson v. Griffin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Commission of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilson v. Griffin, 1 White & W. 764 (Tex. Super. Ct. 1881).

Opinion

Opinion by

Walker, R. S., P. J.

§ 1313. Certiorari is not a writ of right; what petition for must show. The writ of certiorari is not granted as a matter of right. The application for it is addressed to the discretionary power of the court, and should show that the applicant has rights, or a valid defense, of which he has been deprived by the erroneous action of the inferior tribunal, or that without fault or want of diligence on his part he has been unable to present .his rights or his defense. [Clark v. Hutton, 28 Tex. 123.] Where a party fails, without good cause shown for such failure, to present his case before the justice, he is not entitled to be relieved from the consequences of his own neglect, by granting him a writ of certiorari. [Haley v. Villeneuve, 11 Tex. 617.] The law exacts of a litigant vigilance at his peril. “ Vigilantibus non dormientibus lex favet.” The petition for certiorari in this case failing to show such facts as entitled appellant to the writ, the suit was properly dismissed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Haley v. Villeneuve
11 Tex. 617 (Texas Supreme Court, 1854)
Clark v. Hutton
28 Tex. 123 (Texas Supreme Court, 1866)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 White & W. 764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-griffin-texcommnapp-1881.