Wilson v. Green

1 White & W. 41
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 29, 1881
DocketNo. 1153, Op. Book No. 3, p. 455
StatusPublished

This text of 1 White & W. 41 (Wilson v. Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilson v. Green, 1 White & W. 41 (Tex. Ct. App. 1881).

Opinion

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§ 98. Citation; service of, by publication. Where the citation was served by publication for four successive weeks prior to the term of the court at which the judgment was rendered, but not for that length of time prior to the return day of the writ, it was held that the service was sufficient, and that a motion to quash the service was properly overruled. [Pas. Dig. art. 1506; R. S. art. 1229; Hill v. Baylor, 23 Tex. 263.]

§ 99. Conflict of evidence. Where there is a conflict of evidence, the verdict of a jury will not be disturbed, however meagre and unsatisfactory the proof sustaining it may be. [Brown v. Boulden, 18 Tex. 431; Tucker v. Anderson, 27 Tex. 281; Evans v. Mills, 16 Tex. 198.]

§ 100. Wife; incompetent to testify, when. In a suit in which the husband is á party, his wife is incompetent to testify in his behalf. [Gee v. Scott, 48 Tex. 510.]

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Evans v. Mills
16 Tex. 196 (Texas Supreme Court, 1856)
Brown v. Boulden
18 Tex. 431 (Texas Supreme Court, 1857)
Gee v. Scott
48 Tex. 510 (Texas Supreme Court, 1878)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 White & W. 41, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-green-texapp-1881.