Wilson v. Green

New York Supreme Court

Wilson v. Green

20 Wend. 189

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1838

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 20 Wend. 189 (Wilson v. Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilson v. Green, 20 Wend. 189 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1838).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court, Co wen, J.

The affidavit upon which the application was made for an adjournment was clearly insufficient j but if otherwise, we cannot notice the objection. It is not properly a part of the record.

The return, I think, shows that, in evidence on the trial, the defendant proved that the plaintiff had parted with his title before he commenced the proceedings; but that we cannot notice, according to the case of Birdsall v. Phillips, 17 Wendell, 464.

Proceedings affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court, Co wen, J.

The affidavit upon which the application was made for an adjournment was clearly insufficient j but if otherwise, we cannot notice the objection. It is not properly a part of the record.

The return, I think, shows that, in evidence on the trial, the defendant proved that the plaintiff had parted with his title before he commenced the proceedings; but that we cannot notice, according to the case of Birdsall v. Phillips, 17 Wendell, 464.

Proceedings affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 Wend. 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-green-nysupct-1838.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack