Wilson v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Wilson v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

196 S.E. 300, 57 Ga. App. 497, 1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 320

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 16, 1938·No. 26651·Published

Opinion

Bkoyi/es, O. J.

In this case, sufficient evidence having been adduced to authorize the finding of the Department of Industrial Relations that the minor son of the claimant, at the time of his accidental death, was not an employee of the defendant company, the judge of the superior court did not err in affirming the award denying compensation to the claimant.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre a/nd Chierry, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bkoyi/es, O. J.

In this case, sufficient evidence having been adduced to authorize the finding of the Department of Industrial Relations that the minor son of the claimant, at the time of his accidental death, was not an employee of the defendant company, the judge of the superior court did not err in affirming the award denying compensation to the claimant.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre a/nd Chierry, JJ., concur.

Wilson v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 196 S.E. 300, 57 Ga. App. 497, 1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 320 (Ga. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

196 S.E. 300 (Wilson v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.