Wilson v. Frisbie, Roberts & Co.

57 Ga. 269
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 15, 1876
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 57 Ga. 269 (Wilson v. Frisbie, Roberts & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilson v. Frisbie, Roberts & Co., 57 Ga. 269 (Ga. 1876).

Opinion

Bleckley, Judge.

We see no cause for reversing the judgment below. The parties settled, and a note was given for .the balance between them. There, it seems to us, was the natural and proper point for the termination of their disputes, if they had any differences to adjust. After that transaction, all that remained was to pay the note. The clerical error afterwards discovered in the account, was not of the least consequence. It had no influence on the calculations, and, therefore, did not vitiate the result. There was sickness, and that may have prevented a nice scrutiny of the account; but the evidence shows that, from the account, or from some other source, the plaintiff in error, notwithstanding his sickness, had knowledge of all the material facts when he gave the note sued on. He may now think he acted without due preparation, but we think otherwise. He was well enough informed; and his subsequent change of mind, seems due to something that ought to have had no weight. While his purpose was to pay the note, he was on the right path; and, from the facts in the record, we do not hesitate to say that he had no sufficient reason for a “ new departure.” The evidence admitted by the court to explain the cipher telegram was competent. Unless such communications are to be translated by those who understand the signs and characters in which they are expressed, courts'and juries would never be able to arrive at their meaning. If they are to come into court at all, they must speak through an intepreter.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hensley v. State
186 S.E.2d 729 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1972)
People v. Newman
148 P.2d 4 (California Supreme Court, 1944)
Linville v. State ex rel. Board of Commissioners
29 N.E. 1129 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 Ga. 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-frisbie-roberts-co-ga-1876.