Wilson v. Fisher
This text of 142 P. 241 (Wilson v. Fisher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action brought by plaintiff to recover $145.75 for labor and material furnished to defendant. Defendant admitted the correctness of all of plaintiff’s claim except the sum of $19.95, but he set up a claim for* goods furnished to plaintiff to the amount of $149.05. Plaintiff replied admitting that he had obtained goods from the defendant to the amount of $82.11 and asked judgment against defendant for $63.64, the difference between his claim of $145.75 and $82.11. The case was submitted to a referee, who made findings upon which the court rendered judgment against defendant in the sum of $5.51. It thus appears that the amount in controversy, so far as defendant is concerned, is less than $100. Defendant’s entire claim was $149.05 and he admits that he was owing plaintiff on account the sum of $125.80. The difference between these amounts, $23.25, was the extent of his claim against the plaintiff. This sum added to the amount of the judgment rendered falls far short of $100, the amount necessary to give jurisdiction on appeal. (Civ. Code, § 566.) Indeed the disputed claims of both taken together did not amount to the jurisdictional amount of $100. The appeal will, therefore, be dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
142 P. 241, 92 Kan. 786, 1914 Kan. LEXIS 322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-fisher-kan-1914.