Wilson v. Finney

New York Supreme Court

Wilson v. Finney

13 Johns. 358

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 15, 1816

StatusPublished

Cited by16 cases

This text of 13 Johns. 358 (Wilson v. Finney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilson v. Finney, 13 Johns. 358 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1816).

Pincite

Opinion

Per (Juriam.

' This judgment cannot be supported.,: -There is no Colour for-depriving the plaintiff of a recovery-for the value of two sheeps as there is no pretence that more than four ■were taken under the'attachment against him. But the plain til? [359]*359vTas. entitled to recover for the whole number. The property in the sheep, delivered by the plaintiff, was changed, and duly vested -in the defendant. He was under no obligation to return the same. sheep,' but only those of equal value; They were at his .absolute, disposal and risk. - • . . ■

J udgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per (Juriam.

' This judgment cannot be supported.,: -There is no Colour for-depriving the plaintiff of a recovery-for the value of two sheeps as there is no pretence that more than four ■were taken under the'attachment against him. But the plain til? [359]*359vTas. entitled to recover for the whole number. The property in the sheep, delivered by the plaintiff, was changed, and duly vested -in the defendant. He was under no obligation to return the same. sheep,' but only those of equal value; They were at his .absolute, disposal and risk. - • . . ■

J udgment reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 Johns. 358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-finney-nysupct-1816.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack