Wilson v. Fikes
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Javece Wilson, Case No. 21-cv-0606 (WMW/BRT)
Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION
Warden Fikes,
Respondent.
Before the Court is the November 10, 2021 Report and Recommendation (R&R) of then-United States Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. (Dkt. 16.) No objections to the R&R have been filed. In the absence of timely objections, this Court reviews an R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Having reviewed the R&R, the Court finds no clear error. Based on the R&R and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The November 10, 2021 R&R, (Dkt. 16), is ADOPTED. 2. Petitioner Javece Wilson’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, (Dkt. 1), is DENIED. 3. This matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: February 16, 2022 s/Wilhelmina M. Wright Wilhelmina M. Wright United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wilson v. Fikes (Wilson v. Fikes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.