Wilson v. Fairfield Inn Suites-Marriott, RDU

689 F. App'x 760
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 25, 2017
DocketNo. 17-1047
StatusPublished

This text of 689 F. App'x 760 (Wilson v. Fairfield Inn Suites-Marriott, RDU) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilson v. Fairfield Inn Suites-Marriott, RDU, 689 F. App'x 760 (4th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Nathan E. Wilson seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s text orders denying his motion to appoint counsel and denying without prejudice his motion regarding mediation. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The orders Wilson seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
689 F. App'x 760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-fairfield-inn-suites-marriott-rdu-ca4-2017.