Wilson v. Fairfield Inn Suites-Marriott, RDU
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Nathan E. Wilson seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s text orders denying his motion to appoint counsel and denying without prejudice his motion regarding mediation. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The orders Wilson seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
689 F. App'x 760 (Wilson v. Fairfield Inn Suites-Marriott, RDU) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.