Wilson v. Eggleston

109 So. 923, 215 Ala. 701
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 30, 1926·No. 7 Div. 542.·Published

Opinion

MILLER, J.

The judgment in this cause is affirmed for failure of appellant to observe rule 13 of the Supreme Court. No brief was filed by appellant in this cause. Tenn. Valley Auto Co. v. State, 206 Ala. 702, 89 So. 924; Locklear v. State, 205 Ala. 236, 87 So. 712. Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE and GARDNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. Eggleston, 109 So. 923, 215 Ala. 701 (Ala. 1926).

109 So. 923 (Wilson v. Eggleston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Locklear
87 So. 712 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1920)
Tennessee Valley Auto Co. v. State
89 So. 924 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1921)