Wilson v. Eaton

5 N.H. 141
Superior Court of New Hampshire·Decided January 15, 1830·Published

Opinion

In this case the writ is not general; the demand is of an entire thing.

Upon enquiry of the counsel, it was ascertained that the parcel of land in dispute, and which the demandant proposed to describe in his amended count was within the limits of the tenant’s enclosure, and that the deman-dant had not entered into that parcel pending the suit and the court allowed the amendment upon terms.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. Eaton, 5 N.H. 141 (N.H. Super. Ct. 1830).

5 N.H. 141 (Wilson v. Eaton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.