Wilson v. Duncan

112 So. 48, 92 Fla. 470
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided August 3, 1926·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinions

Where the owner consigns cotton to his factors who make advances and charge interest thereon as *Page 471 well as sell cotton retaining advances, interest, commissions and charges, and under circumstances of financial stress and the low price of cotton the factors secure from the owner an agreement to divide profit after all charges are paid should the price advance, the factors being reasonably secured if the price recedes, such agreement under the facts of this case, will not in equity be a defense against a bill for an accounting for all the profits after all charges are fully paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. Duncan, 112 So. 48, 92 Fla. 470 (Fla. 1926).

112 So. 48 (Wilson v. Duncan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zaki Kulaibee Establishment v. Henry H. McFliker
771 F.3d 1301 (Eleventh Circuit, 2014)
Peterson v. Hancock
1 So. 2d 255 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1941)
Crown Corp. v. Robinson
174 So. 737 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1937)
McDade v. McDade
146 So. 228 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)
Washington Loan & Trust Co. v. Hutchinson
144 So. 343 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)
Kirkpatrick v. Hindman
116 So. 862 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1928)
Farmers Bank Trust Co. v. the Ravlin Corp.
114 So. 246 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1927)