Wilson v. District Court

111 A. 927, 95 N.J.L. 265, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 285
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 15, 1920·Published

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court. '' - ‘

For affirmance — The Chibe Justice, Swayze, TreN-CHARD, BERGEN, IÍALISCH, BLACK, KaTZENBACPI, Wl-IITE, HePPENI-IEIMER, WILLIAMS, TAYLOR, GARDNER, AOKERSON, JJ. 13. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. District Court, 111 A. 927, 95 N.J.L. 265, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 285 (N.J. 1920).

111 A. 927 (Wilson v. District Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.