Wilson v. Director of Revenue

164 S.W.3d 142, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 810, 2005 WL 1266391
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 31, 2005
DocketNo. ED 84333
StatusPublished

This text of 164 S.W.3d 142 (Wilson v. Director of Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilson v. Director of Revenue, 164 S.W.3d 142, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 810, 2005 WL 1266391 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Director of Revenue (hereinafter, “Director”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment setting aside the one year suspension of Matthew L. Wilson’s (hereinafter, “Driver”) driving privileges and imposing a ninety day suspension for violation of Missouri’s “Zero Tolerance Law.” Director’s sole point on appeal claims that the trial court erred in imposing a ninety day suspension because Driver’s second notice of suspension prevented automatic expungement of Driver’s first zero tolerance suspension under Section 302.545.2 RSMo (2000).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. We find the trial court’s judgment did not erroneously declare or apply the law. Knipp v. Director of Revenue, 984 S.W.2d 147, 151 (Mo.App. W.D.1998). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Knipp v. Director of Revenue
984 S.W.2d 147 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
164 S.W.3d 142, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 810, 2005 WL 1266391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-director-of-revenue-moctapp-2005.