Wilson v. D.C. Supreme Court

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided August 14, 2012·No. Civil Action No. 2012-0603·Published

Opinion

FILED

UNITED STATES I)ISTR!CT couRT AUG f 4 2012 FoR THE DISTRICT oF CoLUMBIA C,erk U s

District & Courts for th Eankrupzgy 6 D:stnctr)f Colu ' mma

SHERONNE ELAINE WILSON, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 12-603

V.

D.C. SUPREME COURT,

§J§\_/\./£S\/\./\J

Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The Court has allowed the above-captioned action to be provisionally filed. Before the Court would consider the plaintiff’ s complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis, the plaintiff was directed to submit a certified copy of his trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent), including the supporting ledger sheets, for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of this complaint, obtained from the appropriate official of each prison at which plaintiff is or was confmed. 28 U.S.C. § l9l5(a)(2). To date, the plaintiff has not submitted the required financial information. Accordingly, the Court will dismiss the

complaint and this action. An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

Qi¢.c~f»»#/¢@

United States District Judge

DATE; F//» //1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. D.C. Supreme Court, (D.D.C. 2012).

Wilson v. D.C. Supreme Court (Wilson v. D.C. Supreme Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.