Wilson v. Darwin

1 Hill & Den. 670
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 15, 1841
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Hill & Den. 670 (Wilson v. Darwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilson v. Darwin, 1 Hill & Den. 670 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1841).

Opinion

By the Court, Cowen, J.

We have held, that in debt on a promissory note, the damages must he assessed by the clerk. By parity, in debt on account, they must be assessed under a writ of inquiry.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Hill & Den. 670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-darwin-nysupct-1841.