Wilson v. Cuomo

District Court, E.D. New York·Decided September 30, 2022·No. 2:21-cv-04815·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------x

ROBERT WILSON,

Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM & ORDER 21-CV-4815(EK)(ST) -against-

ANDREW M. CUOMO, et al.,

Defendants.

------------------------------------x ERIC KOMITEE, United States District Judge: The Court has received Magistrate Judge Shields’ Report and Recommendation (R&R) dated August 28, 2022. ECF No. 52. Judge Shields recommends that Defendants Yvette Aguiar and David Hegermiller’s motion to dismiss be granted in its entirety. No party has filed objections, and the time to do so has expired. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee’s note to 1983 addition; accord State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Grafman, 968 F. Supp. 2d 480, 481 (E.D.N.Y. 2013). Having reviewed the record, I find no clear error and therefore adopt the R&R in its entirety. Thus, all claims against Defendants Aguiar and Hegermiller are dismissed. SO ORDERED.

/s/ Eric Komitee__________ ERIC KOMITEE United States District Judge

Dated: September 30, 2022 Brooklyn, New York

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. Cuomo, (E.D.N.Y. 2022).

Wilson v. Cuomo (Wilson v. Cuomo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Grafman
968 F. Supp. 2d 480 (E.D. New York, 2013)