Wilson v. Cromwell
This text of 30 F. Cas. 119 (Wilson v. Cromwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
But
refused to give such instruction; and upon the prayer of Mr. Morsell, for defendant, THE COURT instructed the jury that if they should be of opinion that the Bowyers came into possession of the bill by authority of the plaintiff for the purpose of collection, and they gave it up to the defendant to be cancelled, without any fraud on the part of the defendant, and the plaintiff afterwards obtained possession of the bill by a fraudulent and deceitful practice, the plaintiff could not recover upon it. And that If -they should be of opinion that the note was fairly given up by Bowyer to th'e defendant to be cancelled, and the plaintiff obtained possession of it by any false pretence, it would be evidence of a fraudulent obtaining of the possession.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 F. Cas. 119, 1 Cranch 214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-cromwell-circtddc-1804.