Wilson v. Cox
This text of 144 S.E. 169 (Wilson v. Cox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff’s petition prayed for an interlocutory injunction to prevent the defendant from proceeding in the prosecution of a dispossessory warrant. The testimony in proof of the respective claims of the plaintiff and the defendant to possession of the premises in question is in sharp and striking conflict. The case falls within the well-settled rule of this court, that the discretion of the trial judge in granting or refusing an injunction upon conflicting evidence will not be interfered with, unless there is a manifest abuse of discretion.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
144 S.E. 169, 166 Ga. 705, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-cox-ga-1928.