Wilson v. County of Los Angeles
This text of 49 F. App'x 699 (Wilson v. County of Los Angeles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Ricky Dale Wilson appeals the district court’s denial of his petition to file a civil [700]*700rights action in forma pauperis. We affirm.
California’s one-year statute of limitations for personal injury actions applies to claims brought under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, and 1985. Taylor v. Regents of the University of California, 993 F.2d 710, 711 (9th Cir.1993). Wilson’s claims accrued in June 1995 but he did not file his complaint until July 2000. The statute of limitations was not sufficiently tolled to save his action.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the [700]*700courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
49 F. App'x 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-county-of-los-angeles-ca9-2002.