Wilson v. Commissioner of Social Security

N.D. Ohio

Wilson v. Commissioner of Social Security

DecidedAugust 10, 2021

Docket3:20-cv-00820

StatusUnknown

This text of Wilson v. Commissioner of Social Security (Wilson v. Commissioner of Social Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wilson v. Commissioner of Social Security, (N.D. Ohio 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

James M. Wilson, Case No. 20 CV 820

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION -vs- JUDGE JACK ZOUHARY Commissioner of Social Security

Defendant.

Plaintiff James Wilson filed this Complaint seeking judicial review of the final decision denying his application for Supplemental Security Income and Disability Insurance Benefits (Doc. 1). This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Carmen Henderson pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), 1383(c)(3), and Local Rule 72.2(b). Her Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) denies Wilson’s alleged errors and concludes the Commissioner’s decision should be affirmed (Doc. 18). Objections to the R&R were due July 23, 2021 (id.). No objections were filed. Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court reviews de novo those portions of the R&R to which objections are made. Failure to file objections within the timeframe set forth in the statute constitutes a waiver of de novo review. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d 976, 984 (6th Cir. 2005). This Court has reviewed the R&R and finds it accurately states the facts and law. This Court therefore adopts the R&R in its entirety. The Commissioner’s decision is affirmed; the Complaint is dismissed. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Jack Zouhary JACK ZOUHARY U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

James M. Wilson, Case No. 20 CV 820

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION -vs- JUDGE JACK ZOUHARY Commissioner of Social Security

Defendant.

Plaintiff James Wilson filed this Complaint seeking judicial review of the final decision denying his application for Supplemental Security Income and Disability Insurance Benefits (Doc. 1). This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Carmen Henderson pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), 1383(c)(3), and Local Rule 72.2(b). Her Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) denies Wilson’s alleged errors and concludes the Commissioner’s decision should be affirmed (Doc. 18). Objections to the R&R were due July 23, 2021 (id.). No objections were filed. Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court reviews de novo those portions of the R&R to which objections are made. Failure to file objections within the timeframe set forth in the statute constitutes a waiver of de novo review. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d 976, 984 (6th Cir. 2005). This Court has reviewed the R&R and finds it accurately states the facts and law. This Court therefore adopts the R&R in its entirety. The Commissioner’s decision is affirmed; the Complaint is dismissed. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Jack Zouhary JACK ZOUHARY U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Wilson v. Commissioner of Social Security, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-commissioner-of-social-security-ohnd-2021.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack