Wilson v. Colwell

3 Watts 212
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 15, 1834·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This writ of error is taken, in effect, to the judgment of the arbitrators, and not to the judgment of the common pleas, which was entered, not even for form’s sake, by the judges of that court, but by the prothonotary. We have before determined that a special award is not to be treated as a special verdict. If the facts be undisputed, state a case and take the actual judgment of the court below upon it; if they are are not, have them found by a jury in the usual course. By this means a suitor may get into the court of the last resort with sufficient rapidity. We certainly will countenance no procedure which passes the door of the legitimate tribunal, and, in the garb of a writ of error, would give us original jurisdiction.

Writ of error quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. Colwell, 3 Watts 212 (Pa. 1834).

3 Watts 212 (Wilson v. Colwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pettit v. Clever
68 A. 960 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1908)
Bacon v. Ward
10 Mass. 141 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1813)