Wilson v. Collins

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6431

FRED LEWIS WILSON,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

B. COLLINS, Sgt.; M. WILLIAMS, C/O; H. BISHOP, C/O; J. DURHAM, C/O; SGT. KING; LT. KILBOURNE; C/O HYLTON; C/O BOYD; C/O ROBERTS; C/O TABOR; SGT. ELY; TED THOMPSON, Dr.; M. STANFORD, RN; MELISSA SPEARS, LPN; PATSY GARNETTE ZEPPA, RN; PATRICIA HILLMAN, RN,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:08-cv-00638-GEC-MFU)

Submitted: June 1, 2010 Decided: June 9, 2010

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Fred Lewis Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Fred Lewis Wilson seeks to appeal the district court’s

order granting partial summary judgment for Defendants in this

42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. This court may exercise

jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006),

and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.

§ 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.

Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Wilson seeks

to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable

interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny

Wilson’s pending motions for discovery and to amend and dismiss

the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED