Wilson v. City of New York

1 A.D.3d 157, 766 N.Y.S.2d 841, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11844
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 13, 2003·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Stallman, J.), entered March 28, 2003, which, inter alia, denied the motion of second third-party defendant Gandhi Engineering, EC. to sever the second third-party action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court properly exercised its discretion in denying Gandhi’s motion for a severance since the actions involve common factual and legal issues and judicial economy would be served by trying them together, the court afforded Gandhi an adequate opportunity to complete discovery, and Gandhi has not otherwise demonstrated prejudice due to its having been impleaded at the “eleventh-hour” (see e.g. Rothstein v Mil[158]*158leridge Inn, 251 AD2d 154 [1998]; Pescatore v American Export Lines, 131 AD2d 739 [1987]). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Sullivan and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. City of New York, 1 A.D.3d 157, 766 N.Y.S.2d 841, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11844 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

1 A.D.3d 157 (Wilson v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Maltese v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J.
165 N.Y.S.3d 277 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Range v. Trustees of Columbia Univ. in the City of N.Y.
2017 NY Slip Op 1138 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Range v. Trustees of Columbia University
147 A.D.3d 487 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Escourse v. City of New York
27 A.D.3d 319 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)