Wilson v. City Bank
This text of 30 F. Cas. 116 (Wilson v. City Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
held, that the demurrer was good, as to the first, second, and fourth causes of demurrer; but not for the third.
1. The bill ought to have alleged, that the plaintiff was a subject or citizen of some one foreign state.
2. The allegation ought to have been, that the corporators were all citizens of some one Or more state or states of the United States.
3. The circuit court has jurisdiction to aid in enforcing the judgment of a state court.
4. That Williams was a necessary party to the bill.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 F. Cas. 116, 3 Sumn. 422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-city-bank-circtdma-1838.