Wilson v. City Bank

30 F. Cas. 116, 3 Sumn. 422
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts·Decided October 15, 1838·Published

Opinion

STORY, Circuit Justice,

held, that the demurrer was good, as to the first, second, and fourth causes of demurrer; but not for the third.

1. The bill ought to have alleged, that the plaintiff was a subject or citizen of some one foreign state.

2. The allegation ought to have been, that the corporators were all citizens of some one Or more state or states of the United States.

3. The circuit court has jurisdiction to aid in enforcing the judgment of a state court.

4. That Williams was a necessary party to the bill.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson v. City Bank, 30 F. Cas. 116, 3 Sumn. 422 (circtdma 1838).

30 F. Cas. 116 (Wilson v. City Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.