Wilson v. City Bank

30 F. Cas. 116, 3 Sumn. 422
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts
DecidedOctober 15, 1838
StatusPublished

This text of 30 F. Cas. 116 (Wilson v. City Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilson v. City Bank, 30 F. Cas. 116, 3 Sumn. 422 (circtdma 1838).

Opinion

STORY, Circuit Justice,

held, that the demurrer was good, as to the first, second, and fourth causes of demurrer; but not for the third.

1. The bill ought to have alleged, that the plaintiff was a subject or citizen of some one foreign state.

2. The allegation ought to have been, that the corporators were all citizens of some one Or more state or states of the United States.

3. The circuit court has jurisdiction to aid in enforcing the judgment of a state court.

4. That Williams was a necessary party to the bill.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 F. Cas. 116, 3 Sumn. 422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-city-bank-circtdma-1838.