Wilson v. CF. VATTEROTT CONSTRUCTION, COMPANY

358 S.W.3d 166, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1592, 2011 WL 5942221
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 29, 2011
DocketED 95752
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 358 S.W.3d 166 (Wilson v. CF. VATTEROTT CONSTRUCTION, COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wilson v. CF. VATTEROTT CONSTRUCTION, COMPANY, 358 S.W.3d 166, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1592, 2011 WL 5942221 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Frank Wilson (Wilson) appeals from the trial court’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Order and Final Judgment (final judgment) upholding its interlocutory judgment on Wilson’s petition for damages and trespass against C.F. Vatterott Construction Company and West End, LLC and denying Wilson’s Motion to Set Aside Judgment and Request for Order to Issue *167 to County Surveyor. We affirm the trial court’s final judgment.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the- legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value or serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

in Re Moody National Kirby Houston S, LLC
412 S.W.3d 570 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
358 S.W.3d 166, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1592, 2011 WL 5942221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-cf-vatterott-construction-company-moctapp-2011.