Wilson v. Cavanaugh
This text of 25 A.D.2d 905 (Wilson v. Cavanaugh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Memorandum by the Court. We perceive no basis to disturb the exercise of discretion by Special Term in directing a joint trial of the actions in Tompkins County; and the papers, upon which application was made to change the place of trial for the convenience of witnesses, were fatally deficient. Order affirmed, without costs, and without prejudice to a proper application for change of place of joint trial for the convenience of material witnesses.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 A.D.2d 905, 269 N.Y.S.2d 961, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wilson-v-cavanaugh-nyappdiv-1966.